Iran Shaken: Inside Israel’s Overnight Strikes & Tehran’s Retaliation

 

In the early hours of June 13, 2025, Tehran and multiple Iranian cities were jolted awake by a series of massive explosions. What began as rumbling noises quickly devolved into flashing flames, debris-filled skies, and widespread panic. Israeli fighter jets and drones unleashed wave after wave of strikes, targeting nuclear facilities, military installations, and the residences of senior Iranian military figures. The operation—dubbed Operation Rising Lion—was a meticulously planned, large-scale campaign aimed at decapitating Iran's nuclear and military leadership while delivering a strategic deterrent signal (aljazeera.com).

🎯 Goals Behind the Strike

The explicit objective, declared by Israel Defense Forces and Prime Minister Netanyahu, was clear: to cripple Iran’s nuclear program and degrade its ballistic missile capacity before Tehran could cross the final threshold to weaponization .

Key targets included:

  • The Natanz uranium enrichment facility, long a focal point of Iran’s nuclear program.

  • Advanced centrifuge centers across Khondab and Khorramabad—sites critical to ramping up enrichment levels.

  • The private homes and offices of IRGC commanders—notably Gen. Hossein Salami, Gen. Mohammad Bagheri, and Gholam Ali Rashid.

  • State nuclear scientists like Fereydoun Abbasi and Mohammad Mehdi Tehranchi (aljazeera.com, en.wikipedia.org).

Over 200 Israeli aircraft dropped more than 330 munitions on over 100 targets across at least eight locations—including the capital, Tehran; Natanz; and Tabriz—constituting the most extensive airborne raid since the Iran‑Iraq War (aljazeera.com).

🛑 Civilian Impact & Shockwaves

  • Tehran residents described the night as surreal. One Al Jazeera correspondent noted that many spoke of feeling “in shock,” alarmed by sudden sirens and the roar of explosions outside their windows .

  • Residential compounds—some housing junior military personnel and families—were hit, causing both military and civilian casualties. Iranian state media acknowledged several civilian deaths alongside the loss of high-ranking officers and scientists (aljazeera.com).

  • Despite the devastation, the IAEA reported no radiation spike at Natanz, suggesting the nuclear facilities were damaged without causing a radioactive release (aljazeera.com).

🏛️ Iran’s Immediate Response

Leadership and Public Messaging

Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei decried the strikes as criminal acts, warning that Israel would suffer a “bitter and painful fate” in retaliation (aljazeera.com).

State media confirmed the deaths of IRGC commander Hossein Salami, Armed Forces Chief of Staff Mohammad Bagheri, and scientists Abbasi and Tehranchi—an unprecedented blow to Iran’s military-political elite (aljazeera.com).

Redeployment and Military Mobilization

  • Iran reportedly launched over 100 Shahed-style drones toward Israel in immediate retaliation. Many drones were intercepted over Israeli and Jordanian airspace (aljazeera.com).

  • The Iranian military declared an "internet blackout" and imposed strict media controls to manage information flow and maintain internal unity .

  • Iran moved to suspend all participation in upcoming nuclear negotiations, effectively breaking off diplomatic channels (en.wikipedia.org).

✈️ Regionwide Turbulence

  • Airspace closures ensued across the region. Iran, Israel, Jordan, Iraq, and Saudi Arabia halted commercial flights amid ongoing military activity and fear of escalation .

  • Several countries—Germany, Qatar, UAE, and France–UK–Germany coalition—urged immediate de-escalation and emphasized the need for restraint .

🇺🇸 The U.S. Position: Cautious Support

  • Former President Donald Trump, speaking through intermediaries, said he had given Iran a 60‑day deadline for a nuclear deal—and that Day 61 had arrived. He praised the Israeli strikes and hinted at further action if deterrence failed (timesofisrael.com).

  • Senator Marco Rubio described the strikes as “unilateral Israeli action,” emphasizing Washington’s non-participation while warning Iran against targeting American personnel in the Middle East .

🔥 Strategic & Geopolitical Implications

Nuclear Ambitions Delayed—But Troublingly Close

Iran is known to be producing uranium enriched to 60%, nearing weapons-grade levels. The IAEA had flagged noncompliance just a day prior—the first since 2005—adding urgency to Israel’s timing (en.wikipedia.org).

Leadership Decapitation & Military Shockwaves

By targeting Salami, Bagheri, and key nuclear scientists, Israel struck at the heart of Iranian command infrastructure. Replacing such figures isn't immediate—and Iran’s next moves will indicate how resilient its military hierarchy remains .

Proxy Warfare & Regional Retaliation Risk

Analysts caution that Iran may leverage proxy forces in Lebanon, Syria, Iraq and Yemen to launch asymmetric responses. Escalation beyond drone strikes—e.g., missile barrages across the Gulf—could trigger even wider conflict .

🔍 Global Reaction: On Edge

  • EU diplomats called for calm, fear mounting that renewed violence could destabilize oil markets, tourism, and humanitarian efforts across the Middle East .

  • Airlines diverted flights away from Iranian and Iraqi airspace, creating a ripple in global travel logistics .

  • The IAEA urged both nations to avoid nuclear escalation while affirming that immediate nuclear contamination was not detected .

🔮 What Happens Next?

1. Iran’s Planned Retaliation

Tehran has vowed “harsh punishment,” potentially targeting both Israeli and U.S. assets across the Middle East—perhaps even deploying cyber warfare or naval operations in the Strait of Hormuz .

2. Diplomatic Fallout

Nuclear negotiations have effectively collapsed, at least for now. Even scheduled diplomacy in Oman is sidelined as mutual trust deteriorates .

3. Oil Markets & Economic Ripples

Given Iran’s position as a major oil exporter, any sustained conflict could push crude prices higher, undercut supply chains, and deepen global inflation concerns .

4. U.S. Policy Choices

Washington now faces a critical choice: to join Israel in its calibration—or advocate robust containment to prevent a wider war. Trump’s continued praise suggests sustained support, but geopolitical risk remains high .


🧭A Defining Moment in Middle East Conflict

What unfolded on June 13, 2025, may stand as one of the most consequential chapters in modern Middle East history. Israel’s Operation Rising Lion, with its unprecedented scale and precision, was a show of deterrence—but it also opened a Pandora's box of regional instability.

Tehran’s loss of top generals and nuclear scientists deals a heavy blow—but Iran is now primed to retaliate through missiles, proxies, and asymmetric warfare. The diplomatic space has narrowed, nuclear talks stalled, and pressure is mounting on global actors to choose sides or mediate.

As alarms remain silenced but tense, airspace remains locked, and leaders across capitals call for calm. Yet beneath the surface, a volatile shift is underway—a conflict no longer contained, but expanding through stealth, strategy, and serious stakes.

TAGS;
Breaking News, Israel attack on Iran today, Iran news, Israel, Iran-Israel war, Iran, Israel attack on Iran tonight, War news, Iran attack on Israel, Israel attack on Iran news, Netanyahu, Israel attack, Tehran, Urgent news, Iran International, Attack, Latest news, Israel attacks on Iran, Martyrs of Israel attack, Attack on Iran, Israel attack, ISNA, Israel attack on Tehran, US attack on Iran, BBC Persian

    Post a Comment

    0 Comments